![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEie1B_JY4PqTXKaDfbL3IYXsxeGKJQ2MjOikPlKlVHOIMNDZGkv9XAQGPWkKmfyJpkacMJDWZtq-p8CNRnGPFrTjZP27V0xe-hXuhniEqsBsg6aBy8D1zxJPrVlUffuASE045Xe/s400/Give+A+Damn.bmp)
I guess I can't get past being a cynic.
Am I the only person to think that John Edwards is going to address the paternity issue in an attempt to explain the money issue...ie ..child support ??
Thoughts ?
Ciao,
Aunty Pol
For those who know, love and understand me..no explanation is necessary . For those who do not , none would suffice .
1 comment:
*sigh* No, I don't think you're a cynic. I suspect the campaign fund investigation is helping to move things along.
I haven't followed the story beyond headlines lately. This is going to play out whether or not it is in the public eye because, yes, monitary gain/loss is involved for the participants.
I feel sorry for the poor child & Edward's family.
Post a Comment